Comments on: Supreme Court Affirms Corporate Suffrage

By: JOSEPH

JOSEPH — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:21:11 +0000

CheapTabletsOnline.Com. Canadian Health&Care.Best quality drugs.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy. No prescription pills. Buy drugs online…

Buy:Cialis Professional.Maxaman.Viagra Professional.Viagra Super Active+.Soma.Cialis.Viagra Super Force.Zithromax.Super Active ED Pack.Levitra.Cialis Soft Tabs.Propecia.Viagra.Cialis Super Active+.Viagra Soft Tabs.VPXL.Tramadol….

By: ALAN

ALAN — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:06:08 +0000

Pillspot.org. Canadian Health&Care.No prescription online pharmacy.Best quality drugs.Special Internet Prices. Low price pills. Buy pills online…

Buy:Arimidex.Prednisolone.Actos.Retin-A.Valtrex.Mega Hoodia.Accutane.100% Pure Okinawan Coral Calcium.Zyban.Zovirax.Prevacid.Petcam (Metacam) Oral Suspension.Human Growth Hormone.Lumigan.Synthroid.Nexium….

By: EUGENE

EUGENE — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 04:53:23 +0000

PillSpot.org. Canadian Health&Care.Best quality drugs.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy. No prescription pills. Order drugs online…

Buy:Acomplia.Female Cialis.Aricept.Zocor.SleepWell.Seroquel.Benicar.Zetia.Cozaar.Lasix.Amoxicillin.Wellbutrin SR.Ventolin.Female Pink Viagra.Nymphomax.Buspar.Lipothin.Lipitor.Prozac.Advair….

By: Robert Gosselin

Robert Gosselin — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:40:01 +0000

You almost had us really worried… the scary part is that its getting close to this since corporations can now influence everybody by paying millions of dollars in advertisement for what the board of directors believe is right for the company… Not even the people working for them…

i can only imagine living in a mining town where 1 company already owns the town…

By: terry

terry — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:11:04 +0000

too funny….. tragically too near the truth, since the court believes that money=free speech, free speech=the vote, it’s only logical that they believe money=the vote. Seriously, though, since money clearly influences the votes of others, only persons that are entitled to vote should be allowed to spend money to influence the votes of others. Although it would be impractical/impossible to enforce, that would eliminate corporate spending to influence the vote. Logically, the next step would be to limit individual spending to influnce votes, since great personal wealth shouldn’t entitle a person (who has only one vote) to effectively buy the votes of others. Impractical, but desirable, would be a system where all licensed TV and radio broadcasters were required to provide free air-time to candidates, in return for tax breaks that would make it economically feasible.

Thoughts from the P-nut gallery…..

By: Free Speech, Corporate Personhood, and Suffrage | From the Office of the Principal

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:04:40 +0000

[...] Desperate Blogger [...]

By: Angela Quattrano

Angela Quattrano — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:57:02 +0000

Excellent post. Amazing how many missed the fact that it was snark, a sad reflection on modern analytical reasoning.

By: Kimberly

Kimberly — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:25:18 +0000

If a Corporation gets one vote per director and corporate officer and 3/5 vote per individual employee..those persons should not be allowed a personal vote outside of the Corporation. Otherwise we should all be entitled to two voted per person.